MOT comparison
Toyota C-HR 1st Gen vs Hyundai Kona 1st Gen
How the Toyota C-HR 1st Gen (AX10/AX50) (2016–2023) and the Hyundai Kona 1st Gen (OS) (2017–2023) do at their MOTs, compared at the same mileage so a high-mileage car is never measured against a low-mileage one.
Toyota C-HR 1st Gen (AX10/AX50)
460,721
MOT tests compared · built 2016–2023
Passes more often in 3 of 11 mileage bands
Hyundai Kona 1st Gen (OS)
225,495
MOT tests compared · built 2017–2023
Passes more often in 3 of 11 mileage bands
MOT pass rate by mileage
Share of MOTs passed first time, at the mileage recorded at the test.
15,751 and 13,412 MOTs
72,310 and 48,131 MOTs
98,656 and 56,662 MOTs
86,269 and 43,393 MOTs
65,622 and 28,473 MOTs
46,359 and 16,431 MOTs
29,995 and 8,843 MOTs
18,856 and 4,715 MOTs
11,747 and 2,564 MOTs
7,109 and 1,373 MOTs
8,047 and 1,498 MOTs
Parts that fail more often
Only differences that hold across at least half of the mileage bands we could compare, and that are far too large to be chance, are listed. How we decide
Toyota C-HR 1st Gen fails more often on
-
Windscreen wiper
Fails about twice as often as the Hyundai Kona 1st Gen: 4.4% of MOTs against 2.3%.
In 6 of 11 mileage bands · Driver's View
Hyundai Kona 1st Gen fails more often on
-
Tyre
Fails about 1.5 times as often as the Toyota C-HR 1st Gen: 5.3% of MOTs against 3.3%.
In 8 of 11 mileage bands · Tyre Wear & Damage
Own one of these?
Enter your registration to see your own car's MOT history, its predicted pass chance and what usually fails next at its mileage.
These are differences in real MOT results, not engineering verdicts. Owner mix differs between models (some are more often taxis, first cars or rural cars), which is why every figure compares cars at the same mileage. How we compare cars.
MOT records: DVSA MOT history, which contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. See this the other way round.