MOT comparison
Hyundai Kona 1st Gen vs Toyota C-HR 1st Gen
How the Hyundai Kona 1st Gen (OS) (2017–2023) and the Toyota C-HR 1st Gen (AX10/AX50) (2016–2023) do at their MOTs, compared at the same mileage so a high-mileage car is never measured against a low-mileage one.
Hyundai Kona 1st Gen (OS)
225,495
MOT tests compared · built 2017–2023
Passes more often in 3 of 11 mileage bands
Toyota C-HR 1st Gen (AX10/AX50)
460,721
MOT tests compared · built 2016–2023
Passes more often in 3 of 11 mileage bands
MOT pass rate by mileage
Share of MOTs passed first time, at the mileage recorded at the test.
13,412 and 15,751 MOTs
48,131 and 72,310 MOTs
56,662 and 98,656 MOTs
43,393 and 86,269 MOTs
28,473 and 65,622 MOTs
16,431 and 46,359 MOTs
8,843 and 29,995 MOTs
4,715 and 18,856 MOTs
2,564 and 11,747 MOTs
1,373 and 7,109 MOTs
1,498 and 8,047 MOTs
Parts that fail more often
Only differences that hold across at least half of the mileage bands we could compare, and that are far too large to be chance, are listed. How we decide
Hyundai Kona 1st Gen fails more often on
-
Tyre
Fails about 1.5 times as often as the Toyota C-HR 1st Gen: 5.3% of MOTs against 3.3%.
In 8 of 11 mileage bands · Tyre Wear & Damage
Toyota C-HR 1st Gen fails more often on
-
Windscreen wiper
Fails about twice as often as the Hyundai Kona 1st Gen: 4.4% of MOTs against 2.3%.
In 6 of 11 mileage bands · Driver's View
Own one of these?
Enter your registration to see your own car's MOT history, its predicted pass chance and what usually fails next at its mileage.
These are differences in real MOT results, not engineering verdicts. Owner mix differs between models (some are more often taxis, first cars or rural cars), which is why every figure compares cars at the same mileage. How we compare cars.
MOT records: DVSA MOT history, which contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. See this the other way round.