MOT comparison
Skoda Citigo 1st Gen vs SEAT Mii 1st Gen
How the Skoda Citigo 1st Gen (2012–2020) and the SEAT Mii 1st Gen (2011–2021) do at their MOTs, compared at the same mileage so a high-mileage car is never measured against a low-mileage one.
Skoda Citigo 1st Gen
443,964
MOT tests compared · built 2012–2020
Passes more often in 9 of 11 mileage bands
SEAT Mii 1st Gen
160,476
MOT tests compared · built 2011–2021
Passes more often in 0 of 11 mileage bands
MOT pass rate by mileage
Share of MOTs passed first time, at the mileage recorded at the test.
26,925 and 8,352 MOTs
74,726 and 25,073 MOTs
85,534 and 29,959 MOTs
73,568 and 26,873 MOTs
57,655 and 21,756 MOTs
43,015 and 16,257 MOTs
30,379 and 11,716 MOTs
20,520 and 8,080 MOTs
13,411 and 5,308 MOTs
8,554 and 3,471 MOTs
9,677 and 3,631 MOTs
Parts that fail more often
Only differences that hold across at least half of the mileage bands we could compare, and that are far too large to be chance, are listed. How we decide
Skoda Citigo 1st Gen fails more often on
Nothing that stands out consistently against the SEAT Mii 1st Gen.
SEAT Mii 1st Gen fails more often on
-
Supplementary restraint system (SRS)
Fails about 11 times as often as the Skoda Citigo 1st Gen: 2.4% of MOTs against 0.24%.
In 9 of 11 mileage bands · Dashboard Warning Lights
Own one of these?
Enter your registration to see your own car's MOT history, its predicted pass chance and what usually fails next at its mileage.
These are differences in real MOT results, not engineering verdicts. Owner mix differs between models (some are more often taxis, first cars or rural cars), which is why every figure compares cars at the same mileage. How we compare cars.
MOT records: DVSA MOT history, which contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. See this the other way round.