MOT comparison
SEAT Mii 1st Gen vs Skoda Citigo 1st Gen
How the SEAT Mii 1st Gen (2011–2021) and the Skoda Citigo 1st Gen (2012–2020) do at their MOTs, compared at the same mileage so a high-mileage car is never measured against a low-mileage one.
SEAT Mii 1st Gen
160,476
MOT tests compared · built 2011–2021
Passes more often in 0 of 11 mileage bands
Skoda Citigo 1st Gen
443,964
MOT tests compared · built 2012–2020
Passes more often in 9 of 11 mileage bands
MOT pass rate by mileage
Share of MOTs passed first time, at the mileage recorded at the test.
8,352 and 26,925 MOTs
25,073 and 74,726 MOTs
29,959 and 85,534 MOTs
26,873 and 73,568 MOTs
21,756 and 57,655 MOTs
16,257 and 43,015 MOTs
11,716 and 30,379 MOTs
8,080 and 20,520 MOTs
5,308 and 13,411 MOTs
3,471 and 8,554 MOTs
3,631 and 9,677 MOTs
Parts that fail more often
Only differences that hold across at least half of the mileage bands we could compare, and that are far too large to be chance, are listed. How we decide
SEAT Mii 1st Gen fails more often on
-
Supplementary restraint system (SRS)
Fails about 11 times as often as the Skoda Citigo 1st Gen: 2.4% of MOTs against 0.24%.
In 9 of 11 mileage bands · Dashboard Warning Lights
Skoda Citigo 1st Gen fails more often on
Nothing that stands out consistently against the SEAT Mii 1st Gen.
Own one of these?
Enter your registration to see your own car's MOT history, its predicted pass chance and what usually fails next at its mileage.
These are differences in real MOT results, not engineering verdicts. Owner mix differs between models (some are more often taxis, first cars or rural cars), which is why every figure compares cars at the same mileage. How we compare cars.
MOT records: DVSA MOT history, which contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. See this the other way round.