MOT comparison
Renault Captur Mk2 vs Nissan Juke F16
How the Renault Captur Mk2 (2019–2026) and the Nissan Juke F16 (2nd Gen) (2019–2026) do at their MOTs, compared at the same mileage so a high-mileage car is never measured against a low-mileage one.
Renault Captur Mk2
106,890
MOT tests compared · built 2019–2026
Passes more often in 2 of 7 mileage bands
Nissan Juke F16 (2nd Gen)
183,986
MOT tests compared · built 2019–2026
Passes more often in 0 of 7 mileage bands
MOT pass rate by mileage
Share of MOTs passed first time, at the mileage recorded at the test.
10,864 and 18,993 MOTs
31,453 and 55,604 MOTs
29,249 and 52,491 MOTs
17,990 and 31,612 MOTs
10,229 and 16,007 MOTs
5,067 and 6,709 MOTs
2,038 and 2,570 MOTs
Parts that fail more often
Only differences that hold across at least half of the mileage bands we could compare, and that are far too large to be chance, are listed. How we decide
Renault Captur Mk2 fails more often on
Nothing that stands out consistently against the Nissan Juke F16.
Nissan Juke F16 fails more often on
-
Windscreen wiper
Fails about twice as often as the Renault Captur Mk2: 3.6% of MOTs against 1.9%.
In 5 of 7 mileage bands · Driver's View
-
Rear brake pad
Fails over 20 times as often as the Renault Captur Mk2: 1.9% of MOTs against 0.00%.
In 4 of 7 mileage bands · Braking System
Own one of these?
Enter your registration to see your own car's MOT history, its predicted pass chance and what usually fails next at its mileage.
These are differences in real MOT results, not engineering verdicts. Owner mix differs between models (some are more often taxis, first cars or rural cars), which is why every figure compares cars at the same mileage. How we compare cars.
MOT records: DVSA MOT history, which contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. See this the other way round.