MOT comparison
Nissan Juke F16 vs Renault Captur Mk2
How the Nissan Juke F16 (2nd Gen) (2019–2026) and the Renault Captur Mk2 (2019–2026) do at their MOTs, compared at the same mileage so a high-mileage car is never measured against a low-mileage one.
Nissan Juke F16 (2nd Gen)
183,986
MOT tests compared · built 2019–2026
Passes more often in 0 of 7 mileage bands
Renault Captur Mk2
106,890
MOT tests compared · built 2019–2026
Passes more often in 2 of 7 mileage bands
MOT pass rate by mileage
Share of MOTs passed first time, at the mileage recorded at the test.
18,993 and 10,864 MOTs
55,604 and 31,453 MOTs
52,491 and 29,249 MOTs
31,612 and 17,990 MOTs
16,007 and 10,229 MOTs
6,709 and 5,067 MOTs
2,570 and 2,038 MOTs
Parts that fail more often
Only differences that hold across at least half of the mileage bands we could compare, and that are far too large to be chance, are listed. How we decide
Nissan Juke F16 fails more often on
-
Windscreen wiper
Fails about twice as often as the Renault Captur Mk2: 3.6% of MOTs against 1.9%.
In 5 of 7 mileage bands · Driver's View
-
Rear brake pad
Fails over 20 times as often as the Renault Captur Mk2: 1.9% of MOTs against 0.00%.
In 4 of 7 mileage bands · Braking System
Renault Captur Mk2 fails more often on
Nothing that stands out consistently against the Nissan Juke F16.
Own one of these?
Enter your registration to see your own car's MOT history, its predicted pass chance and what usually fails next at its mileage.
These are differences in real MOT results, not engineering verdicts. Owner mix differs between models (some are more often taxis, first cars or rural cars), which is why every figure compares cars at the same mileage. How we compare cars.
MOT records: DVSA MOT history, which contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. See this the other way round.