MOT comparison
Peugeot 2008 2nd Gen vs Nissan Juke F16
How the Peugeot 2008 2nd Gen (P24) (2019–2026) and the Nissan Juke F16 (2nd Gen) (2019–2026) do at their MOTs, compared at the same mileage so a high-mileage car is never measured against a low-mileage one.
Peugeot 2008 2nd Gen (P24)
135,868
MOT tests compared · built 2019–2026
Passes more often in 0 of 7 mileage bands
Nissan Juke F16 (2nd Gen)
183,986
MOT tests compared · built 2019–2026
Passes more often in 6 of 7 mileage bands
MOT pass rate by mileage
Share of MOTs passed first time, at the mileage recorded at the test.
7,794 and 18,993 MOTs
32,029 and 55,604 MOTs
38,703 and 52,491 MOTs
28,183 and 31,612 MOTs
16,794 and 16,007 MOTs
8,425 and 6,709 MOTs
3,940 and 2,570 MOTs
Parts that fail more often
Only differences that hold across at least half of the mileage bands we could compare, and that are far too large to be chance, are listed. How we decide
Peugeot 2008 2nd Gen fails more often on
Nothing that stands out consistently against the Nissan Juke F16.
Nissan Juke F16 fails more often on
Nothing that stands out consistently against the Peugeot 2008 2nd Gen.
Own one of these?
Enter your registration to see your own car's MOT history, its predicted pass chance and what usually fails next at its mileage.
These are differences in real MOT results, not engineering verdicts. Owner mix differs between models (some are more often taxis, first cars or rural cars), which is why every figure compares cars at the same mileage. How we compare cars.
MOT records: DVSA MOT history, which contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. See this the other way round.