MOT comparison
Nissan Juke F16 vs Peugeot 2008 2nd Gen
How the Nissan Juke F16 (2nd Gen) (2019–2026) and the Peugeot 2008 2nd Gen (P24) (2019–2026) do at their MOTs, compared at the same mileage so a high-mileage car is never measured against a low-mileage one.
Nissan Juke F16 (2nd Gen)
183,986
MOT tests compared · built 2019–2026
Passes more often in 6 of 7 mileage bands
Peugeot 2008 2nd Gen (P24)
135,868
MOT tests compared · built 2019–2026
Passes more often in 0 of 7 mileage bands
MOT pass rate by mileage
Share of MOTs passed first time, at the mileage recorded at the test.
18,993 and 7,794 MOTs
55,604 and 32,029 MOTs
52,491 and 38,703 MOTs
31,612 and 28,183 MOTs
16,007 and 16,794 MOTs
6,709 and 8,425 MOTs
2,570 and 3,940 MOTs
Parts that fail more often
Only differences that hold across at least half of the mileage bands we could compare, and that are far too large to be chance, are listed. How we decide
Nissan Juke F16 fails more often on
Nothing that stands out consistently against the Peugeot 2008 2nd Gen.
Peugeot 2008 2nd Gen fails more often on
Nothing that stands out consistently against the Nissan Juke F16.
Own one of these?
Enter your registration to see your own car's MOT history, its predicted pass chance and what usually fails next at its mileage.
These are differences in real MOT results, not engineering verdicts. Owner mix differs between models (some are more often taxis, first cars or rural cars), which is why every figure compares cars at the same mileage. How we compare cars.
MOT records: DVSA MOT history, which contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. See this the other way round.