MOT comparison
Kia Niro 1st Gen vs Toyota C-HR 1st Gen
How the Kia Niro 1st Gen (2016–2022) and the Toyota C-HR 1st Gen (AX10/AX50) (2016–2023) do at their MOTs, compared at the same mileage so a high-mileage car is never measured against a low-mileage one.
Kia Niro 1st Gen
355,956
MOT tests compared · built 2016–2022
Passes more often in 10 of 13 mileage bands
Toyota C-HR 1st Gen (AX10/AX50)
464,582
MOT tests compared · built 2016–2023
Passes more often in 1 of 13 mileage bands
MOT pass rate by mileage
Share of MOTs passed first time, at the mileage recorded at the test.
11,965 and 15,751 MOTs
45,462 and 72,310 MOTs
65,678 and 98,656 MOTs
59,867 and 86,269 MOTs
46,484 and 65,622 MOTs
33,664 and 46,359 MOTs
24,172 and 29,995 MOTs
17,490 and 18,856 MOTs
12,807 and 11,747 MOTs
9,782 and 7,109 MOTs
15,519 and 8,047 MOTs
8,422 and 2,760 MOTs
4,644 and 1,101 MOTs
Parts that fail more often
Only differences that hold across at least half of the mileage bands we could compare, and that are far too large to be chance, are listed. How we decide
Kia Niro 1st Gen fails more often on
Nothing that stands out consistently against the Toyota C-HR 1st Gen.
Toyota C-HR 1st Gen fails more often on
-
Headlamp
Fails about 3 times as often as the Kia Niro 1st Gen: 3.2% of MOTs against 1.3%.
In 8 of 13 mileage bands · Lights & Signals
-
Windscreen wiper
Fails about twice as often as the Kia Niro 1st Gen: 4.0% of MOTs against 2.2%.
In 8 of 13 mileage bands · Driver's View
Own one of these?
Enter your registration to see your own car's MOT history, its predicted pass chance and what usually fails next at its mileage.
These are differences in real MOT results, not engineering verdicts. Owner mix differs between models (some are more often taxis, first cars or rural cars), which is why every figure compares cars at the same mileage. How we compare cars.
MOT records: DVSA MOT history, which contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. See this the other way round.