MOT comparison
Ford Puma Mk2 vs Nissan Juke F16
How the Ford Puma Mk2 (2019–2026) and the Nissan Juke F16 (2nd Gen) (2019–2026) do at their MOTs, compared at the same mileage so a high-mileage car is never measured against a low-mileage one.
Ford Puma Mk2
286,581
MOT tests compared · built 2019–2026
Passes more often in 4 of 7 mileage bands
Nissan Juke F16 (2nd Gen)
183,986
MOT tests compared · built 2019–2026
Passes more often in 0 of 7 mileage bands
MOT pass rate by mileage
Share of MOTs passed first time, at the mileage recorded at the test.
21,254 and 18,993 MOTs
80,675 and 55,604 MOTs
85,077 and 52,491 MOTs
53,139 and 31,612 MOTs
27,849 and 16,007 MOTs
12,987 and 6,709 MOTs
5,600 and 2,570 MOTs
Parts that fail more often
Only differences that hold across at least half of the mileage bands we could compare, and that are far too large to be chance, are listed. How we decide
Ford Puma Mk2 fails more often on
-
Windscreen washer
Fails about twice as often as the Nissan Juke F16: 0.92% of MOTs against 0.49%.
In 5 of 7 mileage bands · Driver's View
Nissan Juke F16 fails more often on
-
Windscreen wiper
Fails about 9 times as often as the Ford Puma Mk2: 3.8% of MOTs against 0.40%.
In 7 of 7 mileage bands · Driver's View
-
Rear brake pad
Fails about twice as often as the Ford Puma Mk2: 1.9% of MOTs against 0.96%.
In 4 of 7 mileage bands · Braking System
Own one of these?
Enter your registration to see your own car's MOT history, its predicted pass chance and what usually fails next at its mileage.
These are differences in real MOT results, not engineering verdicts. Owner mix differs between models (some are more often taxis, first cars or rural cars), which is why every figure compares cars at the same mileage. How we compare cars.
MOT records: DVSA MOT history, which contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. See this the other way round.